Crude Inventories Up, Price Down
Posted on Wednesday, September 23, 2009
WSJ details:
Crude oil futures prices sold off sharply early Wednesday, dropping below $69 a barrel after U.S. weekly data showed rising inventories and a sharp drop in demand.
Light, sweet crude oil for November delivery had been down about $1.25 a barrel ahead of the data release Wednesday, under pressure from strength in the dollar.But crude dropped swiftly through the $70 and $69 levels after the Energy Information Administration reported a 2.8-million-barrel rise in crude oil inventories for the week ended Sept. 18. Analysts surveyed by Dow Jones Newswires had expected crude stocks to drop by 1.5 million barrels.
And the important of stocks and the price...

Source: EIA
--
Source: http://econompicdata.blogspot.com/2009/09/crude-inventories-up-price-down.html
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
Comments
Calendar
Tag Cloud
Archives
-
▼
2009
(196)
-
▼
September
(31)
- Chicago PMI... New Order Bounceback
- Full Circle... Treasuries vs. High Yield
- Japanese Industrial Production
- Consumer Confidence Trends Down
- Chicago Fed National Activity Index Pointing to Mo...
- Home Prices Stabilizing
- Have We Learned Anything?
- Deflationary Spiral in Japan?
- Dow Breakdown
- Emerging Market Bonds Roar
- Lions Winning Streak at One
- New Home Sales Skew to Low-End
- Banker Pay Limits on the Way?
- GDP Growth by Metro Area (2008)
- Corporate Bonds: From Cheap to Rich
- En-Down-Ments
- Crude Inventories Up, Price Down
- Staycation Phenomenon
- FHFA Home Price Index
- Eurozone Industrials Continue to Bounce off Lows
- Evaluating Equities
- Market Down Big... Market Up Big... Market Typical...
- Leading Indicators Show Continued Strength
- Empire Manufacturing Breakdown
- Japanese vs. European Production
- Shortened Week
- Consumer Credit Freefall
- Lackluster Labor Day Travel Predicted
- Roubini: “U-shaped” recovery is not impossible
- Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Push Review Rule
- Asian Markets Fell Following Wall Street Slide
-
▼
September
(31)
Leave a Reply